Josh Schriver insists gay marriage should be illegal again despite public support

In recent weeks, a Michigan Republican lawmaker, Josh Schriver, sparked intense backlash for his controversial stance on marriage equality. Schriver stated on social media that the U.S. should make gay marriage illegal again, asserting that his position is 'not remotely controversial nor extreme.' This statement comes amid the backdrop of increased visibility and support for same-sex marriage across the nation, as public polling indicates that around 70 percent of Americans believe same-sex marriage should be legally protected. The backlash grew as numerous lawmakers and individuals condemned Schriver's remarks, highlighting the negative impact they could have on the LGBTQ+ community. Among them was Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, who criticized Schriver for his apparent disregard for the rights of same-sex couples. Nessel, who has been married to her same-sex partner since 2015, emphasized that Schriver's statements serve only to harm families and individuals he professes to represent. In Michigan, the issue of marriage equality has become a legislative focal point since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling that recognized same-sex marriage as a constitutional right. Yet, figures like Schriver continue to push back against this progress. Schriver's remarks appear to resonate with a minority perspective, as most polls have consistently shown an increasing acceptance of same-sex marriage over the past decade. It is noteworthy that Schriver's history of controversial statements precedes this recent incident. In February, he faced the repercussions of sharing conspiracy theories linked to divisive and unfounded narratives that suggest a demographic replacement of white Christians in America. This pattern of behavior illustrates a broader trend among some Republican lawmakers who may leverage anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments for political gain, despite overwhelming public support for marriage equality. Schriver's remarks raise essential questions about the future of LGBTQ+ rights in Michigan and beyond, as he directly challenges the established legality of same-sex marriage and the trajectory of public opinion.