Adam Kinzinger calls out Republicans for reversing stance on January 6 attack
- The Minnesota GOP is suing over a special election called by Governor Tim Walz, claiming improper timing.
- With a 67-66 majority, Republicans are concerned about losing their control in the state House.
- The outcome of the special election is expected to significantly impact the legislative balance in Minnesota.
In Minnesota, the Republican Party is contesting the timing of a special election called by Governor Tim Walz. The controversy arises after Governor Walz declared a special election for January 28 to fill a seat vacated by Democratic state Rep.-elect Curtis Johnson, who was blocked from taking his seat due to residency issues. This decision comes at a critical juncture since the Republicans hold a precarious 67-66 majority in the state House as the new legislative session begins. The Minnesota GOP argues that the special election cannot be held until the seat is officially vacant and claims that the governor’s decision violates state election law. Minnesota GOP Chairman Alex Plechash stated that Governor Walz's actions undermine democratic processes and aim to cover up past errors made by the Democrats regarding candidate eligibility. Despite this, Walz's office defends the move, citing state law that mandates the governor to call a special election as soon as feasible. The seat in question is considered heavily Democratic, suggesting that the upcoming election could potentially flip the balance of power in the state legislature back to an even split. As the situation stands, the Republicans hope to maintain their slim majority for a brief window before the special election potentially shifts the political landscape. If the special election goes as predicted, it is expected to create a 67-67 tie in the state House, meaning no party would hold a definitive control. The Minnesota GOP views this timeline as crucial for organizational control during the legislative session, especially given the history of Democratic dominance prior to the 2024 elections. The implications of this legal challenge extend beyond the immediate political ramifications, given that it could influence voter perceptions and future electoral strategies. The scrutiny over the timing of the special election underscores deeper political tensions in Minnesota, reflecting broader national divides. As these events unfold, they will likely impact how both parties approach the upcoming sessions and shape the decisions made regarding key legislation in an increasingly polarized political climate.