Justice Gorsuch Supports Trump's Immunity Decision

Justice Neil Gorsuch has publicly defended the Supreme Court's recent decision to grant former President Donald Trump broad immunity in a series of interviews, framing the ruling as a continuation of established legal precedent. In an interview with Fox News, Gorsuch referenced the 1982 Nixon v. Fitzgerald case, which provided similar protections to former President Richard Nixon, arguing that the court aimed to prevent civil lawsuits from hindering presidential duties. This defense comes amid ongoing discussions about the implications of the ruling, which has reignited calls for reforms within the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's decision, which was made by a 6-3 conservative majority, not only shields Trump from civil lawsuits related to his official actions but also restricts special counsel Jack Smith's ability to present evidence against Trump regarding his conduct following the 2020 election. Gorsuch acknowledged the gravity of the immunity decision, describing it as a matter with significant consequences. However, reports indicate that the justices were divided along ideological lines, with Chief Justice John Roberts reportedly failing to broker a compromise that could have garnered support from the court's liberal justices. In response to the ruling, President Joe Biden has proposed term limits for Supreme Court justices and a constitutional amendment to eliminate presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. However, these proposals face significant opposition from Republicans, who view them as an overreach of power. Gorsuch's comments and the ruling coincide with the release of his new book, "Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law," which critiques the proliferation of federal regulations.