UN agency bans gendered terms amid language crackdown

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), based in Geneva, has implemented guidelines discouraging the use of gendered language among its staff. This initiative includes banning terms like 'Englishman' and 'forefathers', suggesting alternatives such as 'English person' and 'ancestors'. The guidelines aim to promote inclusivity by avoiding masculine-specific terms that may imply a lack of representation for women in various contexts. Other terms like 'man's best friend' are replaced with 'a faithful dog', and 'midwife' is suggested to be replaced with 'birth attendant', although the original term may still be appropriate in certain situations. This move follows similar actions by organizations like the British Red Cross, which faced criticism for its own language policies. Critics argue that such measures reflect a broader trend of political correctness that can stifle free speech. Toby Young, founder of the Free Speech Union, has labeled the guidelines as 'Orwellian', suggesting that they represent a form of totalitarianism by restricting language to promote a specific ideology. WIPO's guidelines are not mandatory but are intended to raise awareness about inclusive language. The organization emphasizes that clarity and common sense should guide communication, while also acknowledging the importance of language that resonates with diverse audiences. This approach aligns with recent trends in various sectors, including healthcare, where gender-neutral terms are increasingly adopted. As organizations continue to navigate the complexities of gendered language, the implications of these guidelines may influence how language is used in professional settings. The ongoing debate highlights the tension between promoting inclusivity and preserving freedom of expression.