Texas moves to ban THC as cannabis legalization gains support

In Texas, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick introduced Senate Bill 3 on December 4, 2024, as part of a significant legislative initiative to outlaw all consumable forms of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). This development stems from concerns related to the sale of unregulated THC products since the passage of House Bill 1325 in 2019, which was originally intended to bolster Texas agriculture by legalizing hemp commercialization. However, the law inadvertently created opportunities for vendors to sell THC products that were otherwise prohibited, leading to calls for comprehensive regulations. Patrick’s office indicated that retailers have exploited the legal gray area to market potentially dangerous THC-infused beverages containing much higher concentrations of THC than standard marijuana. By proposing this blanket ban, Patrick and other supporters argue that they are acting to protect public safety by closing loopholes that have allowed risky products to thrive on the market. This move comes in the wake of heightened scrutiny over cannabis legislation, as local movements towards decriminalization have met with stiff resistance from state officials. The legislative push for stricter laws rides the coattails of a broader conservative effort against cannabis reforms within Texas. Attorney General Ken Paxton has taken an aggressive stance, filing lawsuits against various Texas cities, including Dallas, which recently voted in favor of proposals to decriminalize marijuana possession. Despite 66% of Dallas voters backing Proposition R, Paxton declared it unconstitutional, emphasizing that local authorities lack the jurisdiction to override state drug laws. He characterized this local reform effort as a subversive tactic against Texas drug policy. The introduction of Senate Bill 3 highlights the increasing tensions surrounding cannabis policy in Texas, particularly as it contrasts sharply with a growing nationwide push for legalization and regulatory frameworks. Supporters of the bill believe it is necessary to implement a hardline stance against THC products to ensure that the public remains safe. However, critics warn that such a ban could lead to increased criminal activities, as interested consumers are driven to seek THC products from illegal sources. The situation reflects a complex intersection of political ideology, public health, and law enforcement priorities, indicating that cannabis will likely continue to be a hot-button issue in the state for the foreseeable future.