Oxford Union leader faces backlash for celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination

In the United Kingdom, George Abaraonye, the President-elect of the Oxford Union, has faced severe backlash for his response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA. Kirk was fatally shot during a speaking event at Utah Valley University on September 13, 2025. Following the incident, Abaraonye made insensitive comments in a WhatsApp group, reportedly stating, "Charlie Kirk got shot, let's f---ing go," which ignited public outrage and calls for his resignation. The Oxford Union Society, a prominent debating society known for its historical significance, condemned Abaraonye’s remarks, distancing itself from his actions, emphasizing the need for respectful dialogue rather than celebrating violence. The incident prompted discussions about political violence and free speech, revealing deep divisions in societal values. Critics, including prominent figures like former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, have called for Abaraonye’s expulsion from the University of Oxford, alleging that his behavior has brought disrepute to the institution. The situation has also sparked a larger conversation about rhetoric in political discourse and the consequences of inciting violence against opposing viewpoints. With more than 200 members of the Oxford Union supporting a no-confidence vote against Abaraonye, the university community reflects on what constitutes acceptable political expression. In parallel to Abaraonye’s case, other figures across the political spectrum have faced scrutiny for their responses to Kirk's death. The Connecticut Republican Party accused Bill Beckert, a Democratic school board chairman, of making inappropriate remarks on social media regarding Kirk's murder, further exacerbating tensions surrounding this incident. The wider implications of such responses are prompting educators and community leaders to reflect on the lessons being taught to young people in a politically charged environment. As debates ensue about the appropriateness of celebrating or condemning political violence, the Oxford Union’s upcoming no-confidence vote could mark a pivotal moment in how the society addresses ethical considerations within its leadership. The fallout from Kirk's assassination continues to clash with issues of free speech and the moral responsibilities of public figures, significantly shaping the ongoing narrative within UK politics and societal norms in discourse.