Canadian company seeks U.S. permission to mine oceans, defying international regulations
- The Metals Company has submitted applications to mine the seafloor in international waters through its U.S. subsidiary, seeking exploration licenses and a commercial recovery permit.
- The International Seabed Authority has raised concerns about the legality of such operations conducted without its approval, as it is the designated regulator of mineral activities in international waters.
- This initiative has sparked controversy and opposition from environmental groups, highlighting significant risks to marine ecosystems and questioning the validity of the mining proposal.
In a significant development, a Canadian firm, The Metals Company, through its U.S. subsidiary, approached the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for two exploration licenses and a commercial recovery permit to initiate deep-sea mining in international waters. This move is unprecedented as it marks the first instance of a company seeking to commercially exploit the seabed, previously governed by the Jamaica-based International Seabed Authority, a U.N. agency responsible for regulating mineral activities in international waters. The authority has voiced considerable concern, stating that any commercial operation conducted without its authorization could be deemed illegal under international law. The Metals Company's CEO, Gerard Barron, has positioned this as a timely opportunity for the United States to take a leadership role in the deep-sea resource sector, championing U.S. seabed mining legislation which he argues could enable such operations without the constraints of the ISA. It is essential to note that the United States has not ratified the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, a treaty established in 1994 that governs seabed mining, which complicates matters further. Barron has emphasized the potential benefits, citing crucial minerals such as nickel, copper, cobalt, and manganese that are integral to various sectors including energy and defense. However, the proposal has triggered a backlash from environmental advocates and scientists. Ruth Ramos, an international senior campaigner with Greenpeace, highlights the fierce international opposition this unilateral action faces. Critics point to the lack of established regulations overseeing deep-sea mining and the potential for catastrophic harm to vital ecosystems, warning that exploitation could have irreversible impacts on these lesser-known areas of the ocean. Emily Jeffers, a legal expert at the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity, underscores that the U.S. seabed mining code mandates a comprehensive environmental review, which historically has deterred companies from pursuing such operations. While the applications were filed ahead of an ISA council meeting aimed at discussing the principles of deep-sea mining, experts remain skeptical about the long-term consequences of rushing into extraction activities that can disrupt fragile marine environments. Scientists caution against this approach, iterating that deep-sea ecosystems are complex and poorly understood, making mining in such areas a perilous gamble without thorough exploration and understanding. As tensions mount, the eyes of both the scientific community and international law bodies will be keenly focused on how this situation unfolds in the coming months.