Nevada faces backlash as Senate Bill 395 bans driverless trucks

In April 2025, the Nevada legislature proposed Senate Bill 395 which aims to prohibit the operation of automated vehicles on public roads if they weigh more than 26,000 lbs or can carry more than eight passengers without a human operator present. This bill would mark Nevada as the only state in the United States with a blanket ban on driverless trucks and buses, effectively stifling the introduction of advanced automated vehicle technologies that could enhance road safety and operational efficiency. The legislation echoes an earlier approach taken in California, where similar proposals to ban driverless trucks were vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom over concerns related to innovation and business ramifications. Notably, Nevada, which pioneered the authorization of automated vehicles back in 2011, is now in danger of losing its progressive position in the industry should SB 395 pass. The bill is criticized for putting a hindrance on technological advancement, especially in light of evidence indicating the safety benefits of automated driving systems. Current research from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reveals that human error accounts for over 90% of vehicle crashes, while automated driving technologies can comply with road rules without the human flaws of intoxication, distraction, or drowsiness. Reports from Swiss Re and Waymo confirm that automated driving systems have led to an 88% reduction in property damage claims and a 92% reduction in bodily injury claims compared to human drivers. This strong case for automation underscores the public safety implications that could be compromised by SB 395. Additionally, the reputation of Nevada for being a leader in vehicle automation may be jeopardized if the legislation is enacted. The state has seen a noticeable decline in local road safety rankings, falling from 7th to 37th in recent assessments. Opponents of the bill highlight that existing Nevada laws already address any unsafe practices among driverless vehicles, aimed at ensuring compliance with safety measures while allowing for the advancement of automated technologies. Overall, passing Senate Bill 395 could not only stall innovation but also worsen the state's road safety performance.