May 9, 2025, 5:45 PM
May 9, 2025, 5:45 PM

U.N. fails to address Hamas's use of human shields amid Israeli accusations

Highlights
  • The United Nations has not acknowledged Hamas's use of human shields in its reports on the Israel-Hamas war.
  • International NGOs have similarly downplayed Hamas's tactics, focusing instead on allegations against Israel.
  • The omission of these critical details raises questions about the narratives surrounding the conflict and the responsibility of both parties.
Story

The Israel-Hamas war, which began on October 7, 2023, has seen extensive reporting by the United Nations, totaling 367 individual reports. However, these reports have drawn criticism for failing to acknowledge the tactics employed by Hamas, such as using human shields that intentionally endanger civilians. A recent investigation conducted by the Henry Jackson Society's Centre for the New Middle East highlights the systematic omission of important details regarding Hamas’s strategies in conflict, which has significant implications for the narrative surrounding the conflict. The investigation points out that while Israel has been accused of launching indiscriminate attacks and targeting hospitals, these reports have disregarded Palestinian terrorists' responsibility for civilian casualties. Evidence shown in the compilation indicates that Hamas has not only hidden behind civilians but has strategically utilized civilian infrastructure for military purposes, which aggravates the tragic circumstances in Gaza. Statements from Hamas officials further underline their disregard for civilian life, celebrating martyrdom in the name of their cause. Moreover, notable entities, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have come under scrutiny for insufficiently addressing or omitting Hamas's operational tactics in their analyses of the ongoing conflict. This lack of acknowledgment in their reports raises questions about the credibility of these organizations and the narratives they propagate. Human rights organizations are struggling to balance moral perspectives while holding adversaries accountable for their military conduct. This situation sheds light on a broader issue: the challenge faced by international bodies and NGOs in dissecting and reporting complex conflicts. The Henry Jackson Society's report aims to fill the gap in these narratives, asserting that a truthful discourse should incorporate the full responsibility of both parties involved. This ongoing silence on Hamas's tactics could potentially influence international policy towards the conflict, as geopolitical dynamics shift and new leaderships take office, drawing attention to the hidden dimensions of the Israel-Hamas war.

Opinions

You've reached the end