Debate over renaming Indian university linked to 1866 famine
- The federal education minister proposed renaming Ravenshaw University due to its association with the 1866 Odisha famine.
- Opposition from alumni and political figures highlighted Ravenshaw's contributions to education and the Odia language.
- The debate reflects broader discussions in India about colonial legacies and national identity.
A proposal to rename Ravenshaw University in Cuttack, Odisha, has ignited a debate regarding its colonial legacy. Founded in 1868 by British bureaucrat Thomas Edward Ravenshaw, the university's name is linked to the Great Odisha Famine of 1866, which resulted in the deaths of nearly one million people. Federal education minister Dharmendra Pradhan suggested that the university's name should be changed due to Ravenshaw's role during the famine, prompting discussions about the appropriateness of honoring historical figures associated with colonialism. Pradhan emphasized the need for a debate on whether it is fitting to glorify individuals who contributed to the suffering of the Odia people. His comments were met with backlash from university alumni and opposition parties, who argued that renaming the institution would erase important historical contributions. They highlighted Ravenshaw's role in promoting higher education and supporting the Odia language during a time of struggle. Critics, including former officials and political representatives, defended Ravenshaw's legacy, asserting that he played a crucial role in establishing the university and fostering educational development in Odisha. They expressed concern that the minister's remarks reflected a lack of understanding of the region's history and the complexities surrounding colonial figures. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party supported Pradhan's views, framing them as personal opinions rather than official policy. This incident is part of a broader trend in India, where there have been efforts to reassess and potentially rename institutions associated with colonial rule, reflecting ongoing discussions about national identity and historical memory.