MP's Marriage Sparks Controversy in Hyderabad Over 'Love Jihad'
- A couple in Madhya Pradesh submitted a marriage application, sparking controversy due to their interfaith relationship.
- Hyderabad BJP leader T. Raja questioned the couple’s religious affiliations and labeled the relationship as 'Love Jihad'.
- The leader's remarks have led to calls for intervention from the state government, reflecting ongoing tensions surrounding interfaith marriages.
In Madhya Pradesh, the interfaith relationship between Hasnain Ansari, a Muslim man, and Ankita Rathore, a Hindu woman, has come under scrutiny following their recent marriage application submitted at the local Collector's office. This event has triggered significant controversy, particularly from political figures who are vocal about their opposition to such unions. T. Raja, a BJP leader from Hyderabad, has publicly questioned whether the man changed his religion before the application was filed, emphasizing his concerns about the implications of interfaith marriages. In a video statement, Raja insisted that the relationship might be indicative of 'Love Jihad', a term used to describe alleged coerced conversions to Islam through marriage. He highlighted the alarming trend of violence against Hindu women who enter relationships with Muslim men, creating a narrative of fear and distrust surrounding interfaith marriages. Raja’s outcry has prompted him to urge Madhya Pradesh’s Chief Minister Mohan Yadav to take measures to prevent the couple's marriage. He is also advocating for police protection for Ankita Rathore, suggesting that her safety might illuminate broader societal issues affecting interfaith couples. Raja questioned whether other Hindu women seeking to marry Muslim men would receive similar protection, thereby scrutinizing the government's stance on these matters. As the situation unfolds, Ankita Rathore might seek legal protection, highlighting the need for clarity and guidance regarding the rights of individuals involved in interfaith relationships within a challenging political landscape.