Jasmine Crockett claims Trump supporters are mentally ill

In a recent episode of Katie Couric's podcast, Congressman Jasmine Crockett from Texas made controversial remarks regarding supporters of former President Donald Trump, stating they are 'sick' and indicating that they contribute to a broader 'mental health crisis' in the United States. On June 19, 2025, Crockett claimed that regardless of political affiliation, Americans should oppose Trump, reinforcing the sentiment that support for him reflects underlying mental health issues. She linked the current political climate with a loss of integrity among Republican lawmakers, alleging they violate their oaths to the Constitution out of fear of backlash from the Trump-supporting faction. Crockett's remarks did not go unnoticed, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt came forward with a sharp rebuttal. During a press briefing, Leavitt criticized Crockett’s comments as offensive to nearly 80 million Americans who voted for Trump, asserting that they are hardworking patriots, and encouraged Crockett to attend a Trump rally to witness the diverse support for the former president. Leavitt's response underscored the contentious atmosphere surrounding past and current political views on Trump and revealed deep divisions within American society. Crockett also expressed concern for military personnel serving under Trump, arguing that they signed up to defend principles now contradicted by their commander-in-chief. She lamented the situation of service members involved in a struggle against ideology they should be opposing, while facing a leadership that embodies the very threats to democracy they swore to protect. Her comments aimed to highlight the impact of political leadership on national morale and constitutional adherence. As the political landscape continues to shift, Crockett's comments reflect an ongoing discourse that is shaping the Democratic resistance to Trump’s agenda. This exchange further illustrates the polarizing effect of Trump’s presidency on both sides of the political spectrum and emphasizes the challenges faced by elected officials committed to countering his influence, while dealing with the mental health implications of broader societal support for him.