City Council Calls for Reform of NYPD Disciplinary Powers Following ProPublica Investigation
- NY City Council members advocate for limiting police power in brutality cases.
- ProPublica investigation uncovered NYPD Commissioner's interference in officer disciplinary cases.
- Calls for reform arise following revelations of abuse by officers.
New York City Council members are advocating for significant reforms in the NYPD's disciplinary processes after a ProPublica investigation revealed that Commissioner Edward Caban has been using his authority to halt numerous misconduct cases against officers. The investigation highlighted that Caban has exercised this power to prevent public hearings for dozens of alleged abuse cases, prompting lawmakers to demand that he be stripped of this authority. Councilmember Alexa Avilés emphasized the need for change, stating that the commissioner should not have the power to retain cases without accountability. The controversial authority that Caban has utilized stems from a memorandum of understanding established by the City Council in 2012, which some members now believe should be rescinded. Avilés noted the challenges faced when attempting to legislate reforms concerning the NYPD, indicating a pattern of resistance from the police department. The investigation also revealed that the Civilian Complaint Review Board had recommended disciplinary trials for officers, only to have Caban intervene and prevent these cases from proceeding. In response to the findings, LatinoJustice has filed a lawsuit against the NYPD, arguing that the department's failure to serve charges in specific cases is "arbitrary and capricious." The suit seeks a court order to compel the NYPD to notify officers of charges, thereby ensuring that cases are brought to trial. Despite the mounting pressure, Mayor Eric Adams has expressed support for Caban's approach to officer discipline, even as the commissioner continues to sidetrack ongoing cases.