Wealthy couple accused of assaulting pub staff over refused drinks

In Hampshire, England, a high-profile court case unfolded involving Nathan Sayer, a company director, and his wife, Catharine Sayer, who were accused of assaulting the owners of the New Inn pub after being refused service. The couple allegedly became aggressive and racially abusive after they attempted to order drinks at closing time following a horse riding club Christmas party. When informed that they could not be served another round, they reportedly initiated a fracas that led to Mrs. Sayer's alleged physical assault on Mrs. Faulkner, one of the pub landlords. The incident escalated as the Sayers claimed they were victims of a 'lynch mob,' asserting that they had simply returned to the pub for a forgotten item. Mr. Sayer alleged that staff members were the aggressors who chased them out of the establishment. The couple was charged with racially or religiously aggravated harassment and assault, charges they vehemently deny, arguing that they were acting in self-defense. Mrs. Sayer countered the landlords' claims, stating that her injuries, which they claimed were significant, were exaggerated. During the court proceedings, the Sayers' behavior drew attention, with reports of them laughing and gesturing while in the dock, leading to disruptions in the courtroom. The court heard conflicting testimonies, with Mrs. Faulkner indicating that the Sayers had provoked the situation by demanding beverages in a hostile manner. Nathan Sayer, representing himself, insisted on the aggressive behavior of the staff and downplayed his wife’s actions as defensive from prior assaults they faced within the pub. This trial highlights issues not only of racial tension but also questions the responsibilities of pub owners and staff in managing patrons' behavior. The Sayers' claims of self-defense and victimization stand in stark contrast to the accusations laid against them, making the upcoming trial continuation crucial in determining the truth behind this heated altercation. As of now, proceedings have been adjourned, with the court set to reconvene next month to further examine the presented evidence and testimonies.