U.S. Justice Department investigates admissions policies for racial bias
- The U.S. Justice Department has initiated compliance review investigations into the admissions policies of four Californian universities including Stanford and UC Berkeley.
- U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi stated that the goal of these investigations is to eliminate illegal discrimination in college admissions.
- These actions are part of an ongoing effort by the Trump administration to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in education.
In March 2023, the U.S. Justice Department launched an investigation into the admissions policies at four prominent California universities, including Stanford University and three campuses of the University of California system—UC Berkeley, UCLA, and UC Irvine. This action was initiated following a significant U.S. Supreme Court ruling that addressed affirmative action in college admissions, which prohibited the use of racial or ethnic quotas in evaluating applicants. The investigations are part of a broader trend initiated by the Trump administration, which aims to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that could potentially lead to discrimination against non-minority applicants. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi conveyed that these policies have prioritized racial considerations over merit-based criteria, fostering division among qualified applicants and perpetuating illegal discrimination. Bondi affirmed the commitment to restore meritocracy within educational institutions. The investigations prompted responses from Stanford, which emphasized compliance and a quick assessment of its current admissions practices in light of the ruling. The implications of these investigations extend beyond just the California universities involved, as there are heightened concerns regarding federal funding for schools that do not align with the administration's directives against race-based preferences. This federal oversight reflects a significant shift in policy focus as the government seeks to ensure that admissions processes are equitable for all applicants, emphasizing individual merit rather than group identities. Further backdrops to this situation can be traced to ongoing debates nationally about race, equality, and discrimination in education, igniting discussions about the future of college admissions across the United States.