Dec 16, 2024, 12:39 AM
Dec 3, 2024, 12:00 AM

Yoon Suk Yeol declares martial law as opposition paralyzes government

Highlights
  • On December 3, 2024, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol enacted martial law, alleging that his political opposition is obstructing government functions.
  • Following this declaration, troops were stationed outside parliament to deter lawmakers from reversing the martial law order.
  • Despite a parliamentary vote against the martial law, the military insists it will remain in effect until officially lifted by the president.
Story

In South Korea, President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law during a late-night address broadcast on December 3, 2024. His declaration was a response to his political opposition controlling the national assembly and allegedly sympathizing with North Korea, claiming that their actions have hindered government operations. Troops were deployed to the parliament building to prevent lawmakers from overturning the martial law order. Though the parliamentary body attempted to vote against the declaration unanimously, the military stated that the martial law would remain in effect until the president decided to lift it. General Park An-su, the chief of staff of the Army of the Republic of Korea, has taken charge of the martial law command. The instructions under martial law entail prohibiting all political activities, including those of local councils, political parties, and any demonstrations. Additionally, the press and publications come under strict control by the Martial Law Command. Medical personnel, including those on strike, are also ordered to return to work. The current political climate is marked by tensions between Yoon’s People Power party and the opposition, particularly over national budget disputes. The president accused his opponents of collaborating with North Korea, further polarizing the political discourse. Protests erupted outside the parliament following the unanimous vote against martial law, but military officials reassured that their order would remain in place regardless of legislative actions. Moreover, the Biden administration has reportedly been in contact with the South Korean government, although the specifics of these communications are still unclear. As the situation develops, the implications of martial law for civil liberties and political engagement in South Korea remain a significant concern for citizens and observers alike.

Opinions

You've reached the end