Sep 17, 2024, 12:00 AM
Sep 17, 2024, 12:00 AM

Conservative editor uses racial slur on Haitian migrants during interview

Provocative
Right-Biased
Highlights
  • Rich Lowry appeared on The Megyn Kelly Show and seemingly used a racial slur while discussing Haitian migrants.
  • The incident sparked backlash on social media, with many interpreting his pronunciation of 'migrants' as the N-word.
  • Lowry and his supporters claim it was a mispronunciation, highlighting the sensitivity of language in discussions about race and immigration.
Story

During an appearance on The Megyn Kelly Show, Rich Lowry, editor-in-chief of National Review, seemingly used a racial slur while discussing Haitian migrants. The incident occurred while he was responding to comments made by JD Vance regarding false claims that Haitian migrants were eating neighborhood pets in Springfield, Ohio. Lowry's pronunciation of 'migrants' was perceived by many as resembling the N-word, leading to significant backlash on social media. Kelly, who hosted the show, did not react visibly during the interview but later defended Lowry on social media, suggesting that the criticism was unfounded. Fox News contributor Andy McCarthy also supported Lowry, claiming that the editor simply mispronounced the word and corrected himself without embarrassment. Lowry himself confirmed on social media that he stumbled over the word and did not intend to use any offensive language. The controversy surrounding Lowry's comments highlights the ongoing tensions in discussions about immigration and race in the United States. The claims made by Vance and echoed by former President Trump about Haitian migrants have been widely debunked but continue to circulate in political discourse. This incident serves as a reminder of the sensitivity surrounding language and the potential for misinterpretation in public discussions. As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how this incident will impact Lowry's reputation and the broader conversation about immigration policy and racial issues in America. The National Review has yet to comment on the matter, leaving the public awaiting further clarification from the publication.

Opinions

You've reached the end