Israel and Hamas agree on Gaza ceasefire terms
- US Secretary of State says Israel has accepted Gaza ceasefire terms despite Netanyahu's reported comments
- Blinken's positive update after meeting with Netanyahu raises hopes for a deal to end the Gaza conflict
- There is progress towards a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced on Tuesday that Israel has agreed to withdraw its Defense Forces (IDF) from Gaza, as outlined in a recent proposal aimed at achieving a ceasefire with Hamas. Blinken's remarks came in response to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statements suggesting that Israel would not withdraw from key strategic areas, including the Philadelphi corridor along the Egypt-Gaza border. Blinken emphasized that the agreement specifies the schedule and locations for IDF withdrawals, countering Netanyahu's claims. Despite Netanyahu's assertions, a senior US official criticized his comments as "maximalist statements" that hinder progress toward a ceasefire. Blinken, who was concluding a trip to the region, stated that the responsibility now lies with Hamas to accept the proposal, which aims to halt the ongoing conflict and secure the release of Israeli hostages held by the group. Negotiations are set to continue in Cairo later this week, with the US urging both sides to demonstrate flexibility in reaching an agreement. Hamas has previously rejected any proposal that would allow Israel to maintain control over the strategic corridors, while Israel remains wary of granting Hamas autonomy due to concerns over potential military smuggling. Blinken described his discussions with Netanyahu as positive, highlighting the need for Hamas to agree to the bridging proposal for a ceasefire and the release of hostages. The evolving negotiation framework reportedly involves a staggered release of hostages in exchange for IDF withdrawals and the release of Palestinian prisoners. As tensions persist, Hamas has warned of further attacks if Israeli bombardments continue, underscoring the fragile nature of the ongoing discussions.