Planned shark control expansion risks breaching environmental protections

Queensland, Australia, has announced a significant expansion of its Shark Control Program, allocating nearly $90 million for increased shark nets, drumlines, and drone patrols along its coastlines. This program, which has been in place since the 1960s, aims to reduce the number of large, dangerous sharks in areas frequented by swimmers and surfers. Despite this expansion, experts like Dr. Daryl McPhee have raised concerns about the actual effectiveness of these measures in preventing shark bites, indicating that an increase in protective measures does not guarantee reduced incidents due to the high number of sharks and water users. There is significant skepticism surrounding the proposed expansion, as historical data suggests that many shark incidents have occurred at beaches equipped with shark nets and drumlines. Critics argue that while these protective measures provide a false sense of security to beachgoers, they may not materially reduce the risk of encounters with sharks. Some advocacy groups, including Sea Shepherd, have stated that existing methods, such as gill nets and baited drumlines, often inadvertently harm non-target species, including dolphins and endangered sharks, thereby causing environmental degradation. The planned expansion of the program also faces potential legal challenges. According to Sea Shepherd Australia’s Jonathan Clark, the enlargement of the Queensland Shark Control Program could contravene the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. This legal issue further complicates the expansion, especially as environmental advocates push for a reconsideration of traditional lethal methods in favor of modern alternatives like drone surveillance, shark barriers, and enhanced public education about shark behaviors. In response to these criticisms, the Queensland government has defended its investment by asserting that it is committed to employing all available tools to protect its residents and visitors from shark interactions. However, some critics argue that this stance detracts from exploring environmentally sustainable solutions. While drones may offer a contemporary surveillance option, weather conditions, such as cloudy skies or rough seas, can limit their effectiveness. Meanwhile, strategies focused on education and personal deterrents could provide safer alternatives that lessen harm to both people and marine life. The ongoing tension between beach safety and environmental consciousness highlights a broader debate that needs addressing as Queensland navigates its shark control measures moving forward.