New Yorkers reject Kathy Hochul's congestion toll plan
- A recent Siena College poll shows 51% of New Yorkers oppose the upcoming congestion toll in Manhattan.
- The toll will go into effect on January 5, 2025, starting at $9 daily and increasing to $15.
- Critics argue that the toll unfairly targets low-income residents and express their determination to continue fighting against it.
In December 2024, a statewide poll conducted by Siena College revealed that a majority of New Yorkers are against Governor Kathy Hochul's plan to implement a congestion toll for Manhattan commuters. The scheme, which had been previously paused, was announced to start on January 5, 2025, with a minimum fee of $9 daily for entering Manhattan below 60th Street. The plan is slated to raise the toll to $15 in subsequent years. The poll highlighted that 51% of respondents oppose this congestion tax, with only 29% supportive and 20% uncertain. Notably, opposition was strongest among low-income individuals, with 54% of those earning under $50,000 expressing disapproval. The lack of broad support indicated that there was essentially no demographic group in favor of the plan, challenging Hochul's decision to reinstate it shortly after the November elections. Political reactions have been polarized, with some advocates arguing that the toll would benefit New York's future by reducing traffic congestion and improving public transit. Danny Pearlstein from the Riders Alliance stated that despite the initial unpopularity, people will soon recognize the positive impacts of the policy. On the other hand, critics, including Susan Lee from New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, voiced frustrations over the revival of the plan after a period of pausing and claimed it was being imposed on the public without adequate consultation. The poll also indicated that democratic voters were nearly evenly split, with 42% opposing and 40% supporting the toll. City voters opposed the plan nearly two-to-one, signaling that discontent with the congestion toll is pervasive. This situation sets the stage for ongoing debates regarding traffic management and economic equity in urban policymaking, making it a contentious issue for the future of New York City.