Kamala Harris Faces Scrutiny Over Policy Shifts in Presidential Bid

WASHINGTON (AP) — Kamala Harris, California’s attorney general and current presidential candidate, has come under scrutiny for her evolving positions on key issues, including the death penalty and marijuana legalization. Despite previously opposing the death penalty, Harris defended it in court, raising questions about her convictions as she seeks to reintroduce herself to voters following President Joe Biden's exit from the race. Her campaign has not addressed these policy shifts, which could impact her credibility. Harris's political journey has been marked by contradictions. In her 2004 inauguration speech as San Francisco’s district attorney, she vowed never to charge the death penalty, framing it as a moral stance. However, during a competitive race against Republican Steve Cooley, she stated her commitment to enforcing the death penalty as mandated by law. This duality has led to mixed perceptions of her integrity, with critics noting her pragmatic approach to law enforcement. Additionally, Harris's stance on marijuana has evolved significantly. While she supported medicinal use, her office prosecuted over 1,900 cannabis-related offenses. In her campaigns for California's top law enforcement position, she opposed recreational marijuana sales, a position that contrasted with her Republican opponent's views. Morgan Fox from the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws noted that Harris's changing perspective reflects broader public sentiment, yet questioned whether such shifts are sufficient for a presidential candidate. As Harris navigates her campaign, her past decisions and evolving positions may play a crucial role in shaping voter perceptions and her overall viability in the race.