Fluence Energy faces class action lawsuit over alleged fraud
- A class action lawsuit has been filed for Fluence Energy by Berger Montague PC for alleged securities fraud.
- The lawsuit claims misleading information regarding Fluence’s relationships with Siemens AG and The AES Corporation during the defined Class Period.
- Investors have until May 12, 2025, to seek lead plaintiff status in pursuit of potential recovery.
In the United States, a securities class action lawsuit has been initiated against Fluence Energy, Inc. on behalf of purchasers of Fluence securities during a particular period, from November 29, 2023, to February 10, 2025. The lawsuit claims that the company misled investors regarding its relationships with key revenue sources such as Siemens AG and The AES Corporation, asserting that these relationships were deteriorating. Allegations arose when Siemens accused Fluence of engineering failures and fraud, contributing to a decline in investor trust and stock price. The lawsuit came to light when a report was published by Blue Orca Capital on February 22, 2024, revealing the lawsuit filed by Siemens against Fluence, causing Fluence’s stock price to plummet by over 13%. Further distress was unveiled on February 10, 2025, when Fluence disclosed dismal Q1 fiscal 2025 results, revealing a significant net loss of $57 million, combined with a 49% drop in revenue year-over-year and a substantial cut to revenue guidance. This disclosure caused the shares to fall sharply again, shedding more than 46% of its value in a single day, signaling that investors were beginning to understand the severity of Fluence's financial situation and its implications for their investments. The timing of the disclosures has been pivotal, shaping investor confidence and leading to the initiation of this lawsuit, while raising serious questions regarding Fluence’s business practices and the accuracy of the information provided to investors. The lead plaintiff opportunity, available until May 12, 2025, invites affected investors to represent the broader class, as the case could potentially reshape the company’s future and investor relationships if the allegations are proven.