Priests accused of abuse relocated to remote Pacific islands
- Over 30 Catholic priests and missionaries were moved to remote Pacific islands after allegations of child abuse in the West.
- At least 13 of these relocations occurred with the knowledge of church superiors about the abuse allegations.
- The practice of relocating accused priests has led to further abuse in vulnerable communities, highlighting systemic issues within the church.
Over several decades, more than 30 Catholic priests and missionaries were relocated to remote Pacific islands after being accused or convicted of child abuse in Western countries. This pattern involved at least 10 priests moving to Papua New Guinea alone, with others transferring to nations like Fiji, Kiribati, and Samoa. Church records and survivor testimonies indicate that in many cases, church officials were aware of the allegations before these transfers occurred, effectively shielding the priests from scrutiny. The remoteness of these islands made it difficult for authorities to pursue investigations, allowing the priests to integrate into communities where they were often viewed as trustworthy figures. This situation created a risk for vulnerable populations, as some of these relocated priests went on to abuse new victims in their new environments. Notably, at least three priests were reported to have continued their abusive behavior after their relocation. The church's practice of relocating accused priests has been widely documented, revealing a systemic issue within the institution aimed at protecting its members rather than addressing the allegations. The transfers often occurred in the 1990s, but some priests remain active in ministry today, with one serving in Guam and another returning to New Zealand after being cleared by the church. This troubling history has resurfaced in light of Pope Francis's upcoming visit to the Pacific Islands, highlighting the ongoing impact of the clergy abuse scandal on communities that have been affected by these relocations. The visit serves as a reminder of the need for accountability and transparency within the church regarding past abuses.