Brown and Serrano Clash Over Attorney General Role in Washington
- During a debate, candidates Nick Brown and Pete Serrano presented contrasting views on the role of the state attorney general.
- Serrano advocates for a focus on advising state agencies and constitutional compliance, while Brown emphasizes advocacy for citizens and consumer protection.
- Their differing perspectives highlight ongoing discussions about the priorities and responsibilities of the attorney general's office in Washington.
During a recent debate at the Association of Washington Business 2024 Policy Briefing, candidates Nick Brown and Pete Serrano discussed their differing views on the role of the state attorney general. Serrano emphasized a return to the office's primary function of advising state agencies and ensuring compliance with the state constitution, criticizing current Attorney General Bob Ferguson for what he perceives as legislative overreach. He believes the attorney general should focus on safeguarding the public from regulatory overreach rather than engaging in activism. In contrast, Brown argued that the attorney general's main responsibility is to advocate for those in need and defend the state. He highlighted the importance of civil rights and consumer protection, expressing his intention to continue these efforts and potentially establish a new labor division. Brown views legislative proposals as essential opportunities for the office to address pressing issues. The candidates also addressed consumer protection, with Serrano acknowledging the office's role in shielding the public from marketplace misconduct. He stated that he would only propose legislation when necessary to equip the Attorney General's Office with the tools it needs to function effectively, emphasizing a cautious approach to legislative activism. Both candidates bring unique legal backgrounds to their campaigns, with Brown having served as a U.S. Attorney and general counsel to Governor Inslee, while Serrano has experience as the mayor of Pasco and as an environmental attorney. Their differing perspectives on the attorney general's role reflect broader debates about the office's priorities and responsibilities in Washington.