Investigation into UK special forces faces condemnation over flaws

In Afghanistan, a retired police chief, Alan Pughsley QPM, provided critical testimony regarding the Royal Military Police's initial investigation into allegations of war crimes committed by UK Special Forces. The inquiry, launched by the Independent Inquiry Relating to Afghanistan, examined claims that innocent Afghan civilians were executed during operations carried out by three out of four SAS squadrons between 2010 and 2013. The investigation, notably Operation Northmoor, was described as slow to commence and poorly resourced right from its inception in March 2014. Pughsley pointed out that the most senior investigating officer was inadequately experienced for such a significant investigation, which raised concerns regarding the efficacy of the inquiry. He emphasized that independent advisors’ guidance was frequently not adhered to and noted a lack of efficient staff transitions during substantial personnel changes. This situation likely contributed to the delays and inefficiencies observed throughout the investigation process. The former police chief's evaluation indicated that it took an excessive amount of time—two years—simply to secure appropriate premises, and an additional two years to assemble the necessary resources for the inquiry. Pughsley remarked that if investigators feel unsupported, it leads to disillusionment about the seriousness of the inquiry, thereby undermining public trust. His comments have highlighted ongoing concerns regarding the allocation of resources. Furthermore, Pughsley mentioned that £7 million was expended on a forensics data handling center, suggesting significant mismanagement as this center was ultimately barred from being utilized. In his review, Pughsley referenced multiple outstanding lines of inquiry that remained unexamined, including numerous potential witnesses in Afghanistan as well as crucial data and digital evidence. He concluded that the decision to terminate Operation Northmoor was "inappropriate and premature," reinforcing the criticism levied by bereaved families through their representative law firm, Leigh Day, concerning the investigation's thoroughness and integrity.