Zelenskyy signs law that undermines Ukrainian anti-corruption efforts

In Ukraine, widespread protests erupted following the signing of a controversial law by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on July 22, 2025. This legislation, which alters the oversight of key anti-corruption bodies, has drawn significant criticism from both citizens and European Union officials. Demonstrations occurred in major cities such as Kyiv, Lviv, and Dnipro, with thousands of protesters defying martial law to voice their concerns. The law places the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct control of the Prosecutor General, an appointee of the president, raising fears of increased political influence over these previously independent bodies. Zelenskyy defended the changes by claiming that they are necessary to combat Russian influence within the agencies and to ensure their effective functioning. Despite his reassurances, critics argue that the move undermines years of reform efforts aimed at establishing a robust framework for fighting corruption in Ukraine. The backlash has been swift, with prominent civic leaders warning that the law could lead to rising authoritarianism and jeopardize Ukraine's prospects for European Union membership. International leaders have also expressed alarm over the potential consequences for judicial independence and rule of law in Ukraine. In light of the protests, Zelenskyy has indicated a willingness to address public concerns and has pledged to submit a new bill to parliament. This response reflects the increasing pressure on his administration to maintain the support of both the Ukrainian populace and Western allies, which is vital for continued international aid during the ongoing conflict with Russia. The situation remains fluid as Zelenskyy balances the demands of his government's reforms with the expectations of those who see these changes as a step backward for democracy in Ukraine. As protests continue, the Ukrainian government's next steps will likely be scrutinized closely, particularly regarding the balance between national security and the preservation of democratic institutions. The outcome of this issue could have significant implications not only for internal governance but also for Ukraine's international standing and relations with Europe, particularly in the context of ongoing efforts to join the EU.