Zimbabweans reject protests as security tightens against dissent

On March 31, 2025, Harare and other urban centers in Zimbabwe witnessed significant closures as citizens largely opted to stay home amid calls for anti-government protests. This lack of participation was influenced by government appeals urging the public to ignore the protest calls from a faction of the ruling ZANU-PF party, headed by war veteran Blessed Geza. The protests aimed at pressuring President Emmerson Mnangagwa to resign due to accusations of corruption and attempts to extend his presidency beyond the stipulated term. The planned demonstrations, endorsed by Geza, were conjoined with his support for Vice-President Constantino Chiwenga as a replacement for Mnangagwa. Security was heightened in the capital, with police deployed to disperse any potential gatherings, managing to break up a small crowd on the outskirts of the central business district. This event highlighted the palpable tension between the government and the disenchanted factions within ZANU-PF, alongside a growing populace disheartened by the prevailing economic and social conditions. As school and business closures indicative of a mass shutdown took effect, citizens expressed their discontent over the backdrop of heavy security presence. Many chose to stay home as external influences mounted pressure on them to avoid chaos and potential violence during the protests. Given that Mnangagwa had initially come into power as a reformist following a coup in 2017, his supposed intentions to extend his presidency have led to accusations of desiring unjust prolongation of his political grip, inciting a response from opposing factions. Political analysts debate the implications of the low turnout at the protests. Some characterize it as a defeat for an increasingly fragmented opposition, while others see it as a profound political statement of discontent which reflects deeper issues within the country. Observers note that while Blessed Geza has gained popularity through social media platforms by rallying support, his challenge to Mnangagwa’s authority appears limited in its ability to draw large crowds or unify public sentiment against the government. This division within ZANU-PF further complicates the prospect of seamless political transition, as the factional infighting underlines a systemic crisis characterized by rising dissent and calls for reform. The clergy have advocated for cool heads, underscoring the potential for unrest to destabilize an already fragile nation.