Brine Spreading Debate Intensifies in Pennsylvania

During a recent House Republican Policy Committee hearing, retired geologist Burt Waite raised concerns about the environmental impacts of brine spreading, a practice used to control dust and ice on rural roads. He acknowledged that while some environmental impact is unavoidable, many believe it is a necessary trade-off for safer road conditions. States like Ohio and Michigan have similarly adopted brine to address these issues, highlighting its perceived benefits. However, a proposed bill by Rep. Greg Vitali aims to end the use of wastewater for brine spreading, a move that has met resistance from rural officials. They argue that eliminating brine would exacerbate dust problems in areas with predominantly unpaved roads. Steve Goodwill, roadmaster in Columbus Township, emphasized the financial constraints faced by local governments, stating that they lack the budget to implement alternative dust control methods effectively. Critics of the proposed ban, including Venango County Commissioner Sam Breene, contend that policymakers are disconnected from the realities of rural life, where dust is a significant concern. Breene noted that the negative perception of using oil and gas byproducts for road maintenance is misguided, as it overlooks the practical needs of residents in these areas. Former DEP Secretary David Hess has advocated for a ban on brine spreading to prevent potential environmental pollution. However, many legislators remain skeptical about the extent of harm caused by brine, citing the presence of high-quality water sources in the region and viewing the ban as part of a broader agenda against the natural gas and oil industry.