Aug 19, 2024, 12:00 AM
Aug 19, 2024, 12:00 AM

Pirates May Limit Paul Skenes' Playtime

Highlights
  • Pittsburgh Pirates may reduce Paul Skenes' playing time to manipulate his service time in the league.
  • Skenes has a chance to earn a full year of service time if he ranks first or second in the NL Rookie of the Year voting.
  • The team might strategically limit his appearances to delay his service clock reset for financial purposes.
Story

In a controversial twist in Major League Baseball, the potential impact of Rookie of the Year voting on player service time has raised eyebrows, particularly concerning Pittsburgh Pirates pitcher Paul Skenes. If Skenes finishes in the top two of the National League Rookie of the Year voting, he could secure a full year of service time, which would keep him under the Pirates' control for an additional season. This situation mirrors the experiences of Adley Rutschman and Tanner Bibee, who, despite not meeting the typical service time requirements, received full years due to their voting outcomes. The implications of this voting process are significant for low-revenue teams like the Pirates, as it could result in losing a superstar player for an extra year. Skenes, who has only pitched three innings in major-league exhibitions, is still in contention for the award, highlighting the complexities of service time rules. The Pirates, aware of Skenes' readiness, face a dilemma as they balance his development with the potential consequences of the voting. The Baseball Writers Association of America (BBWAA) has acknowledged concerns regarding the link between Rookie of the Year votes and service time but ultimately deemed the situation manageable, given the diverse opinions of 30 voters. This decision underscores the ongoing tension between player development and team strategy, as teams navigate the intricacies of service time while aiming for competitive success. As the season progresses, the Pirates may need to make strategic decisions regarding Skenes' pitch count and workload, weighing the benefits of immediate performance against long-term team stability.

Opinions

You've reached the end