UCLA police approved for more non-lethal weapons after protests
- The University of California board of regents approved additional non-lethal weapons for UCLA police after large protests against the Israel-Hamas war.
- The approved equipment includes pepper balls, sponge rounds, projectile launchers, and drones, which have faced criticism from students and faculty for their use against peaceful demonstrators.
- The decision highlights ongoing tensions regarding police practices on campus and raises concerns about the prioritization of military equipment over educational resources.
The University of California board of regents approved UCLA police's request for additional non-lethal weapons following significant student protests related to the Israel-Hamas war. The protests, which occurred earlier this year, resulted in numerous injuries and over 200 arrests during a demonstration. The approved equipment includes pepper balls, sponge rounds, projectile launchers, and drones, aimed at providing non-lethal alternatives for law enforcement. Critics, including students and faculty, have expressed concerns about the use of such equipment against peaceful demonstrators, arguing it prioritizes military-style responses over educational resources. During the regents meeting, tensions escalated as student protesters were removed after voicing their opposition to the agenda item. A representative from the UCLA student association condemned the funding for military equipment, highlighting the injuries sustained by students during protests. The university's spokesperson defended the decision, stating that the equipment is intended for de-escalation and is not military-grade. The board's approval also extends to police departments across other UC campuses. Despite the controversy, the UC system's director of community safety clarified that the weapons are not meant for crowd control but for situations deemed life-threatening. The board's decision comes amid ongoing scrutiny of police practices on campus, particularly regarding the treatment of student protesters. The university maintains that the equipment is necessary for ensuring safety and responding effectively to violent situations. As the situation evolves, the implications of this decision may affect future protests and the relationship between students and campus law enforcement. The ongoing debate reflects broader concerns about police militarization and the balance between safety and civil liberties in academic environments.