Abigail Slater champions antitrust policy to protect individual liberty

In March 2025, Abigail Slater, the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, delivered her first speech outlining the principles of a new antitrust policy termed 'America First Antitrust.' The initiative emphasizes protecting individual liberties from corporate and government overreach, as well as adhering to the rule of law. Slater argued that the enforcement of antitrust laws is essential in preserving economic opportunity and competition, especially in sectors that directly affect consumer welfare, including healthcare and housing. Slater's address at the University of Notre Dame highlighted a historical context linking antitrust sentiments to the American Revolution, showcasing the government's role in addressing monopolistic practices that hinder consumer rights. The policy draws inspiration from historical figures such as Oren Cass and reflects a commitment to fierce antitrust enforcement against perceived monopolistic behaviors, particularly among digital platform companies. The emphasis is on litigation as opposed to blanket regulations that could inadvertently favor corporate interests. The approach reveals a shift in the current administration's priorities toward aggressive enforcement measures aimed at dismantling monopolistic practices while aiming to revitalize the competitiveness of the market landscape. Slater articulated a vision where antitrust laws serve to protect 'America's forgotten men and women', enabling them to shape their economic destinies without being hindered by corporately entrenched power. However, critics have raised concerns regarding the populist undertones of the policy, suggesting that it could inadvertently stifle innovation. Opponents argue that in targeting large tech firms, the pressures of antitrust litigation might restrict capital flow essential for research and development. The complexities of applying antitrust in the current economic landscape are highlighted by differing opinions on whether modern corporate strategies equate to historical monopolies, and whether the policy aligns with genuine market enhancement or veers into partisan agendas. Overall, this policy signals a significant development in the country's regulatory approach towards corporate power within the marketplace.