Prosecutor opposes Mark Meadows’ federal court move in Arizona case

In Phoenix, a prosecutor has urged a judge to deny Mark Meadows' request to transfer his charges in Arizona's fake elector case to federal court. Meadows, who served as Donald Trump's chief of staff, argues that his actions were part of his official duties and claims immunity under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. However, the prosecutor contends that Meadows' efforts to overturn the 2020 election results were not authorized actions of his role in the White House. Meadows is facing charges related to an alleged scheme to submit false electors in Arizona and other states to Congress, aiming to keep Trump in office despite his electoral defeat. Prosecutor Krista Wood highlighted that Meadows' communications during this period indicate he was aware of Trump's loss, undermining his defense that he was acting within his official capacity. The indictment includes 18 Republicans involved in the conspiracy, with Meadows not being a fake elector himself but collaborating with others. Meadows previously attempted to move his Georgia charges to federal court, which was rejected by a judge. His attorney, George Terwilliger, argues that important context regarding Meadows' actions is missing and that he delayed the Arizona court move until after a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. The case continues to unfold as Meadows and other defendants plead not guilty to the charges of forgery, fraud, and conspiracy. The Arizona indictment also reveals that Meadows arranged discussions with state officials regarding the fake elector scheme, further implicating him in the alleged conspiracy. The situation reflects ongoing legal challenges faced by Trump associates in the aftermath of the 2020 election.