Trump investigates Harvard Law Review for racial discrimination claims

In the United States, the Trump administration has initiated federal investigations into Harvard University and the Harvard Law Review based on allegations of racial discrimination. Announced on April 28, 2025, these probes are spearheaded by the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services. The investigations stem from a report highlighting that the Harvard Law Review evaluates articles not only by their scholarly merit but also by the race of the authors and the diversity of cited works. This has raised serious concerns regarding adherence to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits race-based discrimination in federally funded educational institutions. The investigation was prompted by internal documents indicating that the article selection process at the Harvard Law Review might prioritize racial identity over qualified submissions. Specifically, statements from the journal's editors suggested disfavor toward authors from non-underrepresented backgrounds while favoritism was shown toward pieces authored by minorities. This approach has raised alarms about a potential ‘spoils system’ that undermines merit in favor of race considerations. The findings indicate that the journal's policies could violate civil rights protections afforded under federal law. Additionally, these investigations are occurring amid broader tensions between the Trump administration and elite educational institutions, particularly concerning compliance with federal mandates. Following Harvard's refusal to adhere to several requests for policy reforms, including those aimed at addressing alleged antisemitism on campus, federal funding cuts amounting to $2.2 billion have already been imposed. Consequently, further examination of possible discriminatory practices will take place, which could lead to additional funding restrictions based on the investigation's findings. Harvard Law Review claims operational independence from the university; however, the financial and organizational connections to Harvard suggest otherwise. The outcome of these investigations may not only impact the institution's funding but could also provide a pathway for private litigants to claim discrimination, as new evidence may surface throughout the inquiries. Harvard University has stated its commitment to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and has expressed intentions to investigate any credible allegations of misconduct surrounding its journal's operations and policies.