New MPs push for a six-hour sitting day in parliament

In the United Kingdom, a group of newly elected Members of Parliament (MPs) has advocated for a significant change to the daily work schedule of the House of Commons. This proposal emerges from a desire to modernize parliamentary practices and make the institution more accessible and accommodating for MPs with families. The recommended hours for parliamentary sessions would be restricted to between 10 am and 4 pm, which would allow increased participation from members. Critics have expressed concern about this shift, labeling it as 'workshy' and emphasizing that long working hours are an expected part of the job description for MPs. The push for reform closely follows Labour's electoral pledge to modernize working conditions within the Commons. As part of this initiative, a cross-party committee has been formed to gather evidence from various stakeholders, including MPs and experts, to assist in drafting legislation that would encapsulate the desired changes. Another key aspect of the proposed changes is the introduction of online voting, which would enable MPs to participate in some votes remotely. This concept of remote voting gained initial traction during the Covid pandemic, although it was ultimately phased out when the previous government resumed traditional in-person voting methods. The renewed discussion surrounding the working hours in parliament aligns with ongoing efforts to create a more family-friendly environment for MPs. Advocates of the changes argue that by modifying the hours and incorporating more digital tools, the Commons would become more inclusive. Furthermore, the proposed reforms recognize the evolving nature of work and the importance of flexibility, which many newly elected members have prioritized since their election. Ultimately, the outcome of these discussions will have significant implications for how parliament operates and whether it can adapt to the contemporary demands of its members. The debate highlights the broader discourse regarding work-life balance in politics and whether traditional practices can continue to meet the needs of MPs in a changing society.