ICE detains Afghan asylum seeker despite parole status

In the United States, following the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, many Afghans who helped U.S. forces have sought asylum or permanent residency. Recently, Nasib, a former Afghan intelligence officer, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during a routine check-in. The detention has raised significant concerns regarding the treatment of Afghan allies in the U.S., especially because he had previously been granted two years of parole. His brother, who suffered severe injuries during a deadly attack in Afghanistan, relies on Nasib's support, which may be jeopardized due to this detention. Nasib's situation exemplifies the struggles faced by Afghans in the U.S. who have dedicated their service to the American military and now find themselves in uncertain circumstances. During Nasib's check-in, his immigration attorney, Susan, was not allowed to accompany him when he was called to meet with the ICE agents. Upon their interaction, she was informed that Nasib's parole status had been revoked without any clear explanation, which raised serious concerns about the guidelines and rationale behind such decisions. The legal and emotional ramifications of Nasib's detention are profound. He had successfully settled into American life after being granted parole, contributing financially to his family in Afghanistan. The detention disrupts not only his life but also the lives of his family members who depend on him. As the date for his asylum hearing approaches in the spring of 2025, uncertainty looms regarding his ability to continue to provide the necessary support for his family, especially given his brother's critical medical needs that require treatment abroad. This incident highlights the broader issue of U.S. immigration policy and the treatment of those who assisted American forces overseas. Individuals like Nasib, who risked their lives to support U.S. efforts, are now facing accusations and detentions that many believe to be unjust. Advocates argue that the government should honor its commitment to these allies and ensure their safety, especially in light of their contributions during critical times in Afghanistan. Nasib's case serves as a stark reminder of the precarious position occupied by these former allies who are seeking protection and stability in a foreign country.