Sep 6, 2024, 12:00 AM
Sep 5, 2024, 12:00 AM

YouTube bans Russia-funded outlet hosting Tim Pool and Benny Johnson videos

Right-Biased
Provocative
Highlights
  • Tenet Media's YouTube channel, which had approximately 316,000 subscribers, was removed for violating community guidelines.
  • The Department of Justice indicted the Kremlin for allegedly funding Tenet Media as part of a disinformation campaign, with claims of $10 million being funneled through foreign entities.
  • The removal of the channel and the indictment highlight ongoing efforts to combat foreign influence operations on social media platforms.
Story

YouTube has taken down Tenet Media's channel, which was home to content from various right-wing commentators, including Tim Pool and Benny Johnson. This action follows a recent indictment by the Department of Justice, which accused the Kremlin of covertly investing $10 million into the company to promote pro-Russia propaganda. The indictment suggests that the funds were laundered through a network of foreign shell companies, aimed at creating English-language videos that align with Russian interests and exacerbate divisions within the U.S. populace. Despite the serious allegations, the DOJ has not implicated the right-wing pundits associated with Tenet Media in any wrongdoing, indicating they may have been misled by the company's founders and Russian operatives. The situation has led to significant fallout, including the termination of Lauren Chen, the owner of Tenet Media, by Blaze Media, which has also removed her profile from its website. As the investigation unfolds, YouTube has stated that it is committed to combating coordinated influence operations, which are increasingly prevalent on social media platforms. The removal of Tenet Media's channel is part of broader efforts to ensure that platforms remain free from foreign interference and disinformation campaigns. The ongoing scrutiny of Tenet Media and its connections to foreign funding raises important questions about the integrity of online content and the potential for manipulation in the digital age. The case serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by social media companies in monitoring and regulating content that may be influenced by foreign entities.

Opinions

You've reached the end