Conservative Women Are Not Oppressed

In recent discussions surrounding conservative women, a narrative has emerged suggesting that their choices reflect oppression rather than agency. Critics argue that women like Hannah Neeleman, who has a large family and a supportive husband, are trapped in traditional roles. However, this perspective overlooks the possibility that these women may find fulfillment in their lifestyles, which can include aspirations beyond societal expectations. The case of Hannah Neeleman, who once dreamed of being a professional ballerina, illustrates this complexity. Despite her current life as a mother of eight in a comfortable home, some insist that her past ambitions indicate dissatisfaction with her present circumstances. This assumption fails to recognize that she may have always desired a large family, challenging the notion that conservative women are inherently unhappy or unfulfilled. Similar sentiments have been directed at Melania Trump, with many viewing her as a victim of her husband's political ambitions. This perception reflects a broader trend where conservative women's choices are dismissed as lacking agency. The left, in particular, struggles to accept that women like Neeleman and Usha Vance can genuinely embrace their roles and beliefs, leading to a denial of their autonomy. Ultimately, the insistence on viewing conservative women through a singular lens undermines the diversity of their experiences. It is essential to acknowledge that women can lead fulfilling lives in various ways, regardless of political affiliation, and that their choices should not be reduced to stereotypes.