Sep 6, 2024, 12:00 AM
Sep 6, 2024, 12:00 AM

Trial concludes for Toowoomba sect in death of diabetic girl

Tragic
Highlights
  • The prosecution alleges that members of a religious group caused the death of Elizabeth Struhs by advising her father to stop her insulin treatment.
  • Defendants argue their religious beliefs justify their actions, claiming Elizabeth would be resurrected and therefore they are not guilty of murder or manslaughter.
  • The case has been adjourned for the judge to consider the verdict, highlighting the complex issues surrounding faith and medical responsibility.
Story

The trial concerning the death of eight-year-old Elizabeth Struhs, who had type 1 diabetes, concluded with members of a Toowoomba religious group delivering their closing statements. The prosecution argued that the group, including her father Jason Struhs, caused her death by advising him to stop administering her insulin. Jason Struhs had provided insulin for Elizabeth for approximately 900 days before converting to the group's faith, which teaches that God heals and discourages the use of medicine. During the trial, Jason expressed regret over Elizabeth's suffering and acknowledged that he had informed her about the dire consequences of not receiving insulin. Despite this, the group maintained their belief that Elizabeth would be resurrected, asserting that she was merely 'sleeping.' Other defendants echoed this sentiment, arguing that their faith justified their actions and that they should not be held criminally responsible for her death. The defendants, including Brendan Stevens and several members of the Stevens family, claimed they were not obligated to seek medical help while at the Struhs' home. They contended that their religious beliefs, which include the notion that death is not final, invalidated the charges of murder or manslaughter against them. They expressed a desire for the court to understand their perspective rather than strictly adhere to legal interpretations. Justice Martin Burns has adjourned the case to consider the verdict, leaving the defendants in a state of uncertainty regarding their future. The trial has raised significant questions about the intersection of faith, parental responsibility, and medical ethics in cases involving children with serious health conditions.

Opinions

You've reached the end