Public skepticism surrounds impending ceasefire proposal between Israel and Hamas
- At The Save Gaza Mega March, demonstrators expressed both hope and skepticism regarding ceasefire talks amid a prolonged conflict.
- Historical patterns show that previous ceasefire proposals have often failed due to added unreasonable conditions.
- The public remains cautious but maintains hope that diplomatic solutions can end the conflict.
In anticipation of the two-year mark since the conflict began between Israel and Hamas, skepticism has risen around the possibility of a ceasefire deal. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators at The Save Gaza Mega March voiced both hope and doubt about a potential peace agreement. With the war nearing its second anniversary on October 7, many noted that past ceasefire proposals have frequently faltered, often due to unreasonable conditions being attached. President Donald Trump previously outlined a peace deal aimed at establishing a ceasefire, but doubts linger regarding its effectiveness and execution. Cohen, a Jewish man who was held hostage in January 2022, expressed mixed feelings about the ongoing discussions. He stated that while he supports the right to free expression, he does not condone expressions that turn into generalizations or attacks against Jews. He has wearing an item symbolizing hope for peace, eager to see a resolution. Alongside activists like Leslie Harris from Code Pink, calls for a diplomatic approach echoed throughout the march, emphasizing that violence does not bring about lasting solutions. Although Cohen remains cautiously optimistic about the ceasefire proposal, historical evidence suggests that significant barriers still exist, primarily due to the complex dynamics of the ongoing conflict. As leaders and advocates move toward discussions aimed at establishing peace, the question remains whether true diplomacy can materialize given the contentious background of the region. Many participants at the march reflect a shared urgency and a commitment to achieving a peaceful resolution, even while grappling with the realities of previous failed agreements. In light of this backdrop, there is a sense of hesitancy among the public regarding the feasibility of achieving lasting peace. As the deadline approaches, individuals from both sides of the conflict continue to watch closely, yearning for a resolution that seems perpetually just out of reach. This situation illustrates the challenges faced not only by those directly involved but by wider communities invested in the outcome of these negotiations.