What the world thought of Harris

The recent US debate has drawn varied reactions from global capitals, highlighting the international implications of the election. In Moscow, the Kremlin expressed irritation over the frequent mentions of President Putin, with spokesman Dmitry Peskov emphasizing their desire to be excluded from US political discourse. Meanwhile, Putin's ironic support for Kamala Harris, noted for her infectious laugh, adds a layer of complexity to Russia's stance. In Kyiv, concerns are mounting over Donald Trump's ambiguous position on Ukraine's war, with fears that a second Trump term could lead to detrimental outcomes for Ukraine. Harris asserted that Trump's presidency would have been catastrophic for Ukraine, suggesting that Putin would have advanced into Kyiv. The debate also revealed a lack of response from Ukrainian officials, indicating a cautious approach to the unfolding political landscape. In Beijing, Kamala Harris remains an enigma, as her lack of a clear track record on China leaves leaders uncertain. Her assertion that the US would prevail in the 21st-century competition against China contrasts with Trump's proposed tariffs on Chinese goods, suggesting a potential continuity in US-China relations regardless of the election outcome. The Middle East is also closely monitoring the race, with Harris's potential tougher stance on Israel raising eyebrows. Trump's claim that Harris 'hates Israel' reflects the heightened tensions surrounding US foreign policy in the region. Overall, the debate has underscored the global stakes involved in the US election, with various countries weighing the implications of either candidate's victory.