Jimmy Lai claims overthrowing the CCP is impossible

In Hong Kong, during his high-profile national security trial, pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai asserted that the notion of ousting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is 'impossible.' This statement was made during his sixth day of testimony, as he continues to face serious charges, including collusion with foreign forces and sedition. Rights groups and foreign governments have condemned the trial as politically motivated, calling for Lai's immediate release. Throughout his testimony, Lai maintained that he did not advocate for international sanctions against Hong Kong, although he acknowledged that international support is crucial for the pro-democracy movement's survival against the increasing influence of the Chinese government. Lai reflected on the 2019 pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, suggesting that the movement could have gained more support from the international community through peaceful demonstrations. He emphasized the importance of maintaining a moral high ground in activism, arguing that if demonstrations are conducted rationally, they have a better chance of garnering sympathy and support. His legal team has expressed serious concerns regarding the conditions of his imprisonment, highlighting issues like solitary confinement and lack of medical care for his diabetes. Lai’s trial is part of a broader crackdown on pro-democracy figures in Hong Kong, aimed at suppressing dissent and consolidating control under the national security law imposed by Beijing. International advocates for Lai argue that the treatment he has received contradicts values upheld in democratic societies, calling for his immediate release. Lai's case highlights the broader challenges faced by activists in Hong Kong, where many have been jailed or silenced since the enforcement of the national security law. The legal system in Hong Kong has drawn scrutiny from various human rights organizations, emphasizing concerns over its fairness and independence. As the trial unfolds, which is expected to continue into 2025, Lai's case may serve as a juncture for international discourse about the state of democracy and human rights in Hong Kong and China. With ongoing tensions indeed central to Hong Kong’s socio-political landscape, the events surrounding Lai’s trial will likely continue to shape international relations concerning China. The response from foreign governments will play a significant role in influencing the pro-democracy movement’s trajectory, which Lai believes offers the ‘salvation’ necessary to protect Hong Kong’s freedoms and way of life against encroachment by Chinese authorities.