Israel reviews Hamas response amid Gaza ceasefire negotiations

In July 2025, Hamas submitted a response to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire proposal, which is currently being reviewed by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office confirmed the review process and indicated that details of the response were not publicly disclosed. A trilateral meeting in Italy involving Israeli, Qatari, and U.S. officials is scheduled to address Hamas's response, reflecting ongoing efforts for a potential ceasefire amidst the current humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The situation is critical as more than 100 aid groups warned of impending mass starvation in the enclave, with many Palestinians, including children, already suffering from malnutrition. Israel and Hamas have differing positions on the negotiations for a ceasefire, which aims to end the conflict that has persisted for nearly 21 months. An Israeli official described Hamas's response as 'workable,' yet specifics remain undisclosed. Netanyahu has expressed stringent demands as criteria to conclude hostilities, including the complete release of hostages taken during previous attacks and the complete dismantling of Hamas's military capabilities. In contrast, Hamas's strategy ties the release of their hostages to the release of Palestinian prisoners. The proposed ceasefire includes a phased approach, suggesting that aid would soon reach Gaza, which has been on the brink of starvation, with reports of dozens of children dying from hunger. The agreement envisions a 60-day truce, during which hostages would be released in stages, and Israeli forces would withdraw from some areas in Gaza. Humanitarian access is a critical aspect of the negotiation, as the blockade imposed has led to severe humanitarian consequences and calls for urgent aid have escalated. Overall, the advancement of the ceasefire proposal is critical as both parties remain entrenched in their positions, with the humanitarian crisis further complicating efforts. The potential for a ceasefire remains contingent on mutual concessions, but the stakes are high, as any missteps could lead to further violence and suffering for the civilian population.