Hezbollah leader vows to resist disarmament until Israel leaves Lebanon

In Lebanon, during a video address on a significant Shiite holy day, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem reaffirmed the group’s stance on retaining its weapons until Israel fully withdraws from southern Lebanon. This statement was made amid ongoing tensions, as Israel continues to occupy five strategic border points in the region and conducts frequent airstrikes that have resulted in numerous casualties. The Israeli military operations are framed as an effort to inhibit Hezbollah's capacity to rebuild after substantial losses during a recent war. The conflict saw considerable fatalities, with over 4,000 deaths reported during the war and an additional 250 killed from Israeli strikes since the ceasefire. Hezbollah's refusal to disarm highlights the deep-seated animosity between the group and Israel, rooted in a historical context of territorial disputes and military conflict. Qassem voiced the necessity of maintaining an arsenal for self-defense against Israeli aggressions, questioning how they would confront ongoing attacks without such capabilities. This resolute stance comes as Hezbollah faces heightened international pressure to relinquish its remaining military arsenal, amidst discussions of potential negotiations involving U.S. envoy Tom Barrack. As the Shiite community commemorated the Battle of Karbala, which symbolizes resistance against oppression, Qassem’s statements resonated with the historical significance of resistance and righteousness. The timing of this commemoration, coupled with the looming discussions regarding disarmament and peace, underscores a pivotal moment for Lebanon as it grapples with its internal divisions and the external threat posed by Israel. The political climate in Lebanon remains tense, with many citizens expressing concern over the implications of disarmament and the potential normalization of relations with Israel. The prospect of disarmament has brought forth a multitude of reactions, reflecting a society divided on the path forward. While some view disarmament as a step towards peace, others see it as a capitulation that could embolden Israeli military actions. The overarching question now is how Lebanon will balance its sovereignty, national security, and the complexity of its political landscape as it moves forward in this historic moment.