Senators Consider Action Against Lidia Thorpe for Outburst at King Charles
- Senator Lidia Thorpe's outburst during King Charles III's visit on October 21 has sparked discussions among Federal government and opposition senators about potential disciplinary actions.
- Thorpe, who previously was a member of the Greens party, stated that she does not pledge an oath to the Crown, raising constitutional concerns about her position as a senator.
- Several Indigenous leaders, while acknowledging her advocacy for Indigenous rights, criticized her behavior as disrespectful and embarrassing during what was supposed to be a respectful event.
On October 21, 2024, during King Charles III's royal visit to Australia, Senator Lidia Thorpe publicly confronted the monarchy, claiming it was responsible for seizing Indigenous land. Thorpe, an Independent senator who previously was affiliated with the Greens, incited further controversy by refusing to pledge allegiance to the Crown as required by members of Parliament. Her actions during this important event have led to discussions among Federal government and opposition senators about potential actions to penalize her. Labor Senator Katy Gallagher emphasized the need to uphold the Senate's integrity, stating that Thorpe's behavior has drawn public concern and appeared disrespectful. The discussions reflect broader tensions within Australian politics regarding Indigenous rights and representation, as well as the constitutional implications of perceived disloyalty to the Crown. Foreign Minister Penny Wong also commented on the situation, noting the unusual nature of Thorpe's behavior and urging her to reflect on her responsibilities as a senator. Meanwhile, Thorpe defended her actions, highlighting issues facing Indigenous Australians, including deaths in custody and child removals. However, her confrontation has not been universally accepted, with numerous Indigenous leaders, including former Senator Nova Peris, expressing their disappointment. They viewed the incident as inappropriate and unrepresentative of Indigenous aspirations and respect for the royal occasion.