Closing arguments begin in King Soopers trial of Ahmad Alissa

The trial of Ahmad Alissa, the accused King Soopers gunman, has reached its closing arguments phase, with deliberations expected to commence shortly thereafter. Judge Ingrid Bakke granted jurors a day off to discuss jury instructions, highlighting the complexity of the case. The defense concluded its presentation, followed by a rebuttal witness from the prosecution, forensic psychologist Dr. Ian Lamoureux, who assessed Alissa's mental state during the incident. Dr. Joshua Hatfield, a forensic psychologist for the defense, described Alissa as 'remarkably psychotic' and noted his delusions and paranoia, including fears of being monitored by the FBI. Alissa's brother testified about his declining mental health since 2019, but he refrained from labeling his brother's condition as a mental illness. This testimony raises questions about Alissa's mental state at the time of the shooting. In contrast, Dr. Lamoureux argued that Alissa was capable of distinguishing right from wrong during the attack. He analyzed video evidence from the shooting, indicating that Alissa acted with intent and awareness, particularly when he targeted victims who were still alive. This suggests a calculated approach rather than a response to hallucinations or delusions. As the trial progresses, the jury will have to weigh the conflicting expert testimonies regarding Alissa's mental health and his culpability in the tragic events that unfolded at the King Soopers store. The outcome will hinge on their interpretation of his mental state and the actions he took during the shooting.