Rand Paul reveals feds surveilled Tulsi Gabbard on flights

In the United States, federal air marshals reportedly surveilled Tulsi Gabbard, the now-Director of National Intelligence, during domestic flights in 2024. This revelation came from Senator Rand Paul, who stated that he received records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirming the surveillance. According to these records, the air marshals tracked Gabbard’s physical appearance and the number of electronic devices she used while traveling. Gabbard pointed out that her experience involved significantly increased airport screening, which she attributes to being placed on the TSA's 'Quiet Skies' watchlist. She expressed her frustration over having to endure prolonged security checks and the feeling of being monitored by her own government. The 'Quiet Skies' program, established by the TSA in 2010, is intended for identifying passengers at risk for terrorism and subjecting them to enhanced screening. Reports indicate that Gabbard was flagged for surveillance after she criticized Kamala Harris in a televised interview. In a follow-up discussion on a news segment, she described the surveillance as a politically motivated attempt to intimidate her and potentially deter others from voicing criticism of political leaders. Gabbard dubbed her placement on the watchlist an 'ultimate sense of betrayal' and called for the program's end. Senator Paul emphasized that this incident is part of a broader issue regarding government censorship and surveillance practices, raising alarm about the implications for civil liberties. Paul revealed that the DHS has been involved in controversial actions that include censorship and monitoring of citizens. Both he and Gabbard are advocating for increased transparency regarding such surveillance activities and expressing concern over their legality and ethicality. The TSA, amidst scrutiny for its lack of transparency and civil liberties violations, has maintained that the 'Quiet Skies' program is a risk-based approach to transportation security, claiming that no terrorists have been detained through this initiative. Nonetheless, critiques persist regarding its effectiveness and the potential misuse of surveillance against innocent citizens. This situation highlights ongoing debates surrounding privacy, government overreach, and individual rights in the United States. The implications of this case extend beyond Gabbard, suggesting a climate of fear and control for anyone who might speak out against those in power. As the events unfold, the public is left questioning the balance between national security and personal freedoms.