Trump calls for immediate shutdown of USAID amid chaos

In early February 2025, President Donald Trump initiated plans to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), triggering widespread concern and confusion among its employees and stakeholders. The decision followed a series of claims made by Trump and his administration about waste and inefficiency within the agency, which were met with significant backlash from those within the humanitarian and development sectors. With major U.S. funding sources under threat, conversations surfaced on the potential negative impacts this could have, such as increased migration from countries like Colombia and Haiti, where USAID-supported programs have played a crucial role in improving livelihood opportunities. As USAID's staff prepared for a dramatic reduction in workforce, many current and former employees described feelings of distress and uncertainty about their future roles and missions. Documents revealed efforts by a task force directed by Marco Rubio, the acting head of USAID, to identify programs that aligned with the current administration's priorities. However, the sudden changes left many employees scrambling, unable to guarantee the continuation of crucial support to vulnerable communities. Critics argued that the administration's approach would dismantle decades of progress made in international development and aid, emphasizing that certain programs were instrumental in curbing migration by enhancing local economies and providing access to essential services. The concerns were especially pronounced in regions affected by violence and poverty, where cessation of U.S. aid could exacerbate pre-existing crises. As lawmakers and advocacy groups rallied to protect USAID's funding, fears grew over a potential humanitarian fallout. The situation has not only raised questions about the effectiveness of Trump’s proposed changes but also highlighted a growing disconnect between the administration's rhetoric and the realities faced by communities relying on assistance. Employees pointed to the irony of focusing on perceived waste while risking the very objectives aimed at addressing the root causes of migration and instability. USAID has provided humanitarian assistance globally for over 60 years, and its sudden retraction could have lasting implications for U.S. foreign policy and international relations.