Colombian court rules '+57' song violates children's rights

In November 2022, a song titled '+57,' created by urban music artists J Balvin and Karol G, sparked significant outrage in Colombia. The high court found that the song's lyrics sexualized minors, which constitutes a violation of children's rights. The court issued a 14-page ruling, instructing Karol G, J Balvin, and other involved reggaeton singers to refrain from producing music that infringes upon the rights of children and teenagers. The court emphasized that sexualizing minors reduces them to mere objects and poses risks that can impact their growth and overall development. The controversy surrounding the song began when it was released, immediately drawing criticism from organizations dedicated to child rights. These organizations demanded the removal of the song from all platforms, arguing that such lyrics could lead to harmful societal perceptions of minors. Music critics did not hesitate to voice their disapproval as well, with some reviewers from reputable outlets, like Rolling Stone’s Spanish website, labeling it a “disaster.” The lyrics of '+57' include provocative references to a young woman who engages in partying and drinking alcohol while being defined by a romantic relationship, further fueling the debate about the message being conveyed through popular music. Both Karol G, whose real name is Carolina Giraldo, and J Balvin, known as Jose Alvaro Osorio, later apologized for the song, acknowledging the backlash. Karol G expressed on her Instagram that the lyrics had been misinterpreted but also indicated that she had much to learn regarding the impact of her music. Following the mounting criticism, a revised version of the song was released on YouTube, which altered the lyrics to claim the woman had been a “hot mama since she was 18” instead of 14, attempting to alleviate some of the contentious implications attributed to the original content of the song. Moreover, the debate underscored broader issues in Colombia, where Medellin, Karol G's hometown, is not only known for its vibrant music scene but also for ongoing challenges in protecting minors from sexual exploitation. The backlash against '+57' triggered conversations about the responsibilities of artists in creating content that is not only entertaining but also socially responsible, especially given the prevalence of predatory behavior targeting young people in popular tourist areas. Critics argue that artists as public figures have a duty to be conscious of the messages they share through their platforms, particularly when those messages involve vulnerable populations like children and teenagers. The court ruling serves both as a specific response to the song '+57' and a broader statement regarding the protection of children’s rights in Colombian society.