Gareth Southgate resigns as England coach amid tense debate on GB News
- Royal author Angela Levin criticized the prospect of Gareth Southgate receiving a knighthood, labeling it as 'absolutely outrageous.'
- Levin argued that knighthoods should be awarded to individuals who have accomplished remarkable feats rather than those who are merely kind-hearted.
- Despite the criticism, some, like top football writer Harry Harris, believe Southgate’s contributions and stability in managing the national team warrant the honor.
The debate around Gareth Southgate's potential knighthood has sparked significant discussion in the UK following his resignation as England head coach earlier this year. Southgate is noteworthy for leading the national team to two successive European Championship finals, a historical achievement that highlights his managerial tenacity, though he did not secure victory in either final. This backdrop creates a contentious atmosphere regarding what criteria should be considered for such honors. Royal author Angela Levin strongly condemned the notion of awarding Southgate a knighthood, branding it as an 'absolutely outrageous' decision. She argues that individuals recognized with such honors should have clear, remarkable achievements rather than being people known for their goodwill. Levin’s comments suggest that a knighthood for Southgate would dilute the gravity of this honor. On the contrary, football writer Harry Harris countered Levin's perspective, asserting that Southgate has provided stability and cultivated belief in the national team, traits that merit recognition. He juxtaposed Southgate with other historical figures who have been knighted despite questionable actions. This ongoing conversation reflects broader societal values about recognition and achievement, as people weigh who should be honored in such a prestigious manner. The differing opinions contribute to an evolving discussion about merit and honor in modern British society.