Pa. Treasurer Candidate Backs Roy Cooper for VP Instead of Gov. Shapiro
- Erin McClelland, a Democratic candidate for Pennsylvania Treasurer, expressed her preference for North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper as a potential vice-presidential pick for President Harris over Governor Shapiro.
- This stance highlights internal dynamics within the Democratic Party regarding candidate selection.
- McClelland’s comments may influence various factions within the party as the election approaches.
In Pennsylvania, a rift has emerged within the Democratic Party regarding the potential vice presidential candidacy of Governor Josh Shapiro. While many party members are rallying behind Shapiro as a running mate for Vice President Kamala Harris, Erin McClelland, the Democratic candidate for state treasurer, has publicly endorsed North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper instead. McClelland's endorsement, shared on social media, included pointed criticisms of Shapiro, suggesting that he lacks the necessary qualities for the role. McClelland's comments alluded to a sexual harassment scandal involving Shapiro's office, where a settlement of $295,000 was reached with an accuser. She emphasized the need for a vice presidential candidate who is secure in their position and would not undermine the president. This public dissent is notable, as candidates typically seek to maintain party unity, especially when they may rely on the support of established leaders like Shapiro in their own campaigns. In response to McClelland's remarks, Shapiro's office has refrained from commenting on personnel issues but has stated that they adhere to thorough procedures for handling discrimination and harassment claims. Meanwhile, other Democratic leaders, including Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta, have voiced strong support for Shapiro, asserting that he would be an excellent choice for the vice presidential slot. As the political landscape evolves, the dynamics within Pennsylvania's Democratic Party could have significant implications for the upcoming elections, highlighting the complexities of party loyalty and candidate selection.